Australia

Soils ain’t soils: NSW DPI on the front foot with carbon sequestration potential in soils.

Last updated February 14, 2009

Soils ain’t soils: NSW DPI on the front foot with carbon sequestration potential in soils.
New South Wales Department of Primary Industries, Australia, 13 Feb 2009

With the potential for carbon sequestration in Australian soils such a hot topic at the moment, NSW Department of Primary Industries (DPI) has dedicated two up-to-date and informative web pages to the issue.

The first web page (www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/research/areas/resources-research/soils-recycled-orga...) highlights a 28-page Scoping Paper: Soil Organic Carbon (SOC) Sequestration Potential for Agriculture in NSW, authored in 2008 by NSW DPI scientists Yin Chan, Annette Cowie, Georgina Kelly, Bhupinderpal Singh and Peter Slavich.

The second web page (www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/research/topics/biochar) provides a comprehensive background to biochar, a carbon-rich material produced from the slow pyrolysis of biomass, which has great capacity to sequester carbon in the soil. This page also outlines the research being conducted by NSW DPI into the potential for this material.

Agricultural bio-char production, renewable energy generation and farm carbon sequestration in Western Australia

Last updated November 28, 2008

Agricultural bio-char production, renewable energy generation and farm carbon sequestration in Western Australia: Certainty, uncertainty and risk
Mark P. McHenry, Murdock University, Western Australia, January 2009
Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, www.elsevier.com/locate/agee
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2008.08.006

Abstract
Reducing the vulnerability of agriculture to climate change while increasing primary productivity requires mitigation and adaptation activities to generate profitable co-benefits to farms. The conversion of woody-wastes by pyrolysis to produce bio-char (biologically derived charcoal) is one potential option that can enhance natural rates of carbon sequestration in soils, reduce farm waste, and substitute renewable energy sources for fossil-derived fuel inputs. Bio-char has the potential to increase conventional agricultural productivity and enhance the ability of farmers to participate in carbon markets beyond traditional approach by directly applying carbon into soil. This paper provides an overview of the pyrolysis process and products and quantifies the amount of renewable energy generation and net carbon sequestration possible when using farm bio-waste to produce bio-char as a primary product. While this research provides approximate bio-char and energy production yields, costs, uses and risks, there is a need for additional research on the value of bio-char in conventional crop yields and adaptation and mitigation options.

Keywords: Bio-char; Charcoal; Soil; Carbon; Renewable; Biomass; Western Australia

Received 22 June 2008; revised 31 July 2008; accepted 5 August 2008. Available online 25 September 2008.

Article Outline
1. Introduction
2. Bio-char production and feedstock
3. Bio-char and agricultural suitability
4. Bio-char and alternative biomass products and services
5. Bio-char production and greenhouse gas emissions
6. Conclusion
References

Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme

Last updated October 14, 2008

<

p>Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme
Jerome Mathews, Australian Biochars www.Biochars.com September 28, 2008
Submission by Australian Biochars Pty Ltd

At the Government seminar to introduce the Government’s Green Paper on the Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (CPRS) held in Brisbane on the 18th July, 2008 Australian Biochars was invited to present a submission as to whether, in its opinion, it would be a viable option to include the use of biochar in some way in the CPRS.

<

p>

For the reasons set out below, it is submitted that such a use would be both viable and effective because:
• Biochar sequesters and stores greenhouse gasses for far longer than forests are able so to do;
• Biochar does not require tending, watering or fertilising, unlike forests;
• Biochar is not subject to the vagaries of disease, fire or weather, unlike forests;
• Biochar increases crop yields;
• Biochar use makes for easy accounting;
• Biochar use is open to participation from multinational corporationsdown to individual users;
• Biochar has high water retention properties and is beneficial in drought conditions.

Peter Cundall: Slow Burning Solution

Last updated March 10, 2009

Peter Cundall: Slow Burning Solution
In Organic Gardener (Australia), September/October 2008, Courtesy Ron Larson and Albert Bates
Using Biochar
Using Biochar


Excerpt:
"How can we use biochar?

That’s where we come in. I’m just one of many gardeners throughout the world beginning to experiment and study the way charcoal, mixed with added minerals – such as forms of decomposed organic matter and other natural nutrients – can be used in suburban food gardens.

Already I have managed to achieve surprising results. For a start, it has become clear that less water and fewer fertilisers are needed in soils enriched with biochar. Acidic soils benefit by being sweetened, earthworm populations increase and bacteria land other forms of life in the soil become more complex and balanced. There is some evidence that methane gas emissions from the soil are also reduced, as well as those of nitrous oxide, a deadly greenhouse gas that is 310 times more destructive to the atmosphere than carbon dioxide.

In our Tasmanian garden, this soil treatment has already produced better, healthier growth and plants that appear to be resistant to diseases and suffer fewer pest attacks.

First, an obvious question: where can gardeners get biochar? How can home gardeners make it, without causing atmospheric pollution? Already a few (though not many) garden centres are selling pulverised charcoal – mainly for orchid growers. It can be expensive, but I believe that in the near future an increased demand for biochar will make it an easily available, cheap soil additive.

How Can we Produce It?

Charcoal can be made from any form of so-called waste organic matter. Our rubbish tips are full of the stuff. Major sources include countless millions of tonnes of factory and farm waste such as animal droppings, sugarcane trash and straw. Forestry and sawmill operations produce great piles of organic debris, much of which is
burnt on site, causing serious pollution and health problems. Deliberately-lit forest burns are a still a major source of greenhouse gas emissions.

Modern techniques of creating huge amounts of biochar by heating organic matter in an almost oxygen-free environment (without pollution) have now been developed and are already in use in many countries. Combustible gases produced during these processes
are carefully drawn off and stored or put to use. Clearly, environmentally-sensible
methods of manufacturing biochar are both possible and beneficial.

Living in a cool climate has helped me make my own charcoal. We use a slow-combustion wood-fired heater and cooker. This flat-top stove is big, black, ugly and built like a Centurion tank. When I bought it 25 years ago, it had a label attached which claimed that it was ‘Guaranteed for Life’.

We can insert two giant logs in it and, by virtually cutting off the air supply, cause the wood to burn slowly while still throwing out heat for the best part of a day. A double-burner ensures no combustible gases escape,and there is hardly any smoke.

It enables us to heat our home and, at the same time, slow-cook casseroles, soups and other food. After about 12 hours, even very large logs have gradually been turned into huge chunks of brittle charcoal that can be easily and safely raked out.

Making biochar mix

After being cooled by being dumped on clumps of perennial weeds and then wetted, the charcoal lumps are ready for crushing. I add wet coco-peat to keep the moisture in and help absorb dust particles. Some gardeners recommend crushing charcoal chunks by placing them in a strong bucket and bashing them. Unfortunately, most buckets
aren’t made to take this type of battering and will quickly fall apart.

An easier, more reliable, method is to use two hefty firewood logs, one of them with a fairly flat surface. Here’s how to do it:
• Spread a plastic sheet over an area of level ground with the flat piece of wood laid on top, near the centre.
• Thickly spread the charcoal pieces over the flat top of the wood and give them
a good thumping using the butt of the second log. It takes only minutes to make half-a-bucket of crushed charcoal.
• Into this, mix one-part each of coarse sand and garden (or potting) soil to double the bulk. Where leafy or other nitrogen-hungry vegetables are to be grown, I also add 2 litres of water into which one tablespoonful of fish emulsion and another of seaweed concentrate is dissolved.
• When this is poured into the charcoal mix, a stiff black slurry, thickly dotted
with fragments of charcoal is created. It can be stored or used straight away.

Other uses

Biochar can also be used as a surface mulch, where the black colour helps the soil to warm more rapidly in early spring. It can also be applied as a side dressing alongside growing plants. I prefer to bury it prior to sowing seed or planting seedlings. If used to grow potatoes, place the seed tubers along the base of a 20cm-deep trench and cover with a thin layer of soil. Then spread a 5cm-deep and wide layer of biochar over the top and back fill with soil.

Does it work?

The most dramatic results I’ve had so far are with sweet corn. I created two
15cm-deep grooves in the soil, then half-filled them with biochar mix and covered this with soil. I sowed the sweet corn seeds just beneath the surface, but in contact with the layer of biochar. I also sowed two other rows of sweet corn seed, this time without biochar, using only pulverised sheep and poultry manure mixed with blood and bone.

Two weeks later the differences were already obvious. The biochar seedlings were up and moving fast, while the rows of untreated seeds showed erratic germination. As the plants grew, I watered all of them and later mulched them in the same way. However, the biochar corn grew with extraordinary strength and final yields were at least
twice that of the untreated rows. Some biochar-treated plants actually bore up
to six large cobs each, because even the side-shoots (normally non-productive)
both carried two cobs each.

A similar biochar experiment with tomato seedlings showed little difference in yield, although treated plants had a slightly healthier leaf colour and showed no signs of disease."

See article attached.

Organic Gardener, New South Wales. http://www.abc.net.au/gardening/features/organic_gardener.htm

For more information about Peter Cundall see:
Peter Cundall (Wikipaedia)
Peter Cundall on Gardening Australia ABC Website

Floating Biochar

Last updated November 06, 2008

Floating char
Max Henderson, Australia, July 27, 2008
Floating Char
Floating Char

8 Weeks Floating Char
8 Weeks Floating Char

Couple of photos 6 weeks apart. Bucket is 20 litres. Added
to the water has been some pee, cow poo and a tablespoon of molasses.
First photo was 2 weeks after adding the char, second is 6
weeks later.

Approx 80% of the char has now sunk. The rest looks like sinking in another fortnight.
The sunken char is much easier to break (in one hand) than the material still in dry storage.

This char was produced at high temp – probably in excess of 800C.

Also of interest is the harvest today of some potatoes 11 weeks after planting in a bed mixture of cocopeat, worm castings, cow poo and char lumps (up to 50mm pieces). There has been significant breakup of the char,
with no mechanical processes involved.

I’m coming to the conclusion that if there is a reasonable mix of moisture, temp, critter activity, humus and nutrients, it matters little in the medium term what size the char particles are.

Max H

Chaotech Pty Ltd

Last updated July 19, 2008

Chaotech Pty Ltd.
Rex Manderson [rexm@chaotech.com.au], Australia, July 2008

BiogasWorks PilotBiogasWorks Pilot

This site www.biogasworks.com is the portal for the carbon cycle activities of Chaotech Pty Ltd.

Our slow carbonization pilot plant is now rated 40 to 60kg charcoal per hour for lightweight feed such as sawdust. The specification particle size limit is 8mm largest dimension. Process simulations have produced a yield of ~40% char on a dry mass basis with ~80% total carbon content in the char.

See: Biogas works

Making charcoal - open fire

Last updated February 07, 2009

I was surprised that there were no how to's for charcoal productions without the need for kilns, drums etc, so thought this might be of interest to some as a trial technique. It is not very efficient by way of volume of charcoal to volume of biomass to start, but can be useful if you have quantities of garden waste such as prunings, bark, leaves etc. This type of stuff normally goes into green waste, or needs chipping to compost or use as mulch as it is too big for compost bin.

This is a process I have used which requires only an open fire or fire pit, shovel or rake and water (hose or steel buckets with water). It is a minor modification of the techniques used when cooking using the camp oven - which only uses coals instead of flame. Instead of transferring the coals to the oven pit, they are wetted down to stop burning, and create charcoal.

Basic technique is the same as if you want to make a fire for a barbeque, or camp fire. To avoid smoke use only dry fuel. In this example we had large quantities of prunings, small branches, dry leaves, bark etc. which needed to be removed before fire season. Most fuel was 5-20mm diameter. Got good results with quantities of bark and dried leaves in another burn.

Start with a small fire, and constantly add fuel - trying to keep the fire relatively small without too much flame.

Once the initial fuel burns, either add more fuel or let it die down to a small pile with coals, often covered with a layer of ash. Once the fire stops producing smoke, or flame, it is pretty much ready. See photo below.

 

 

Camp fireCamp fire

This is fairly advanced into the fire, showing more fuel added to fire. Below is pretty much at the end of burning all available fuel.

 

 

Ready to remove coalsReady to remove coals

 

 

Once all the fuel has burnt, it is now a bit cooler and easier to remove the coals to damp them down, or just wet the entire fire down with hose - thoroughly soak the fire, raking to ensure you have wet it all down. The photo below left is the fire cone opened up to remove coals. In this case I did not have a hose nearby, but steel drums full of water I shovelled coals into. The drums are handy for this as they can then be used to carry the charcoal to the garden area - and charcoal can be crushed in the tin.

 

 

Removing coalsRemoving coals

 

A bucket full of charcoalA bucket full of charcoal

 

 

Ready to useReady to use

 

This shows a shovel full of charcoal after wetting down. I then drain the bucket or transfer from wetted fire pit to bucket, and can be crushed and used straight away. Using garden prunings rather than large branches results in smaller charcoal to start with, and easier to crush. In this case, I got around 200 litres volume of charcoal.

As yet I have not planted anything into the vegie garden beds with the charcoal added, but will now be retaining all green waste to make biochar.

Australian Biochars

Last updated June 21, 2008

Australian Biochars
Jerome Matthews, June 21, 2008
Australian BiocharsAustralian Biochars

Hi There,

We are commercial suppliers of biochars and just thought that you may be interested as we don't think that anyone else is yet producing to our levels. We're happy to receive queries.

You may find us at http://www.biochars.com

Best regards.

Jerome Matthews

Puzzle

Last updated November 06, 2008

Puzzle
Max Henderson, June 15, 2008

Floating Char
Floating Char

More Trials

Last updated May 20, 2008

More Trials
Max Henderson,May 12, 2008

If you can bear with me here is some info from last weekend’s
trials. Various conclusions are probably of little scientific merit and may well be blindingly obvious but I’ll include for those who maybe don’t have one of these exciting toys.

 

  1. The original second–hand house brick kiln had 15cm/6” (when will the US
    join the rest of the world?) gaps between the drum and the bricks on both
    sides, and a relatively shallow space under the drum for the initial fire.
    The idea was that it would be easier to add fuelwood on the sides, but in
    fact this reduced the effectiveness of the insulation.
  2. I re-laid the bricks to give a greater fire space under the drum for the
    initial fire, and moved the side walls inwards so that the only gap was
    between the ridges of the drum and the bricks. The basic concept was to
    apply the heat from underneath, and to insulate as best possible (under
    the primitive circumstances) against any unnecessary heat losses
  3. The drum was loaded with around 100kg of old dry dense hardwood, plus 2 x 75mm
    thick telephone books and some tyre scraps I had collected from beside the
    highway.
  4. Scrap dry wood was loaded under the drum and fired at 17:00. Once that achieved
    a significant burn I added bricks to the open front to further improve
    insulation
  5. I’ve learnt that a slow initial burn is best as opposed to a blast. The
    assumption here is that the mass of material in the drum (despite MC of
    maybe less than 12%), needs gradual heat (given the substantial insulating
    properties of dry dense wood) well before the stage when pyrolisis can
    begin and be sustained. I’ve done the opposite –high initial heat, quick
    gasification, and then no continuation. There is a lot to discuss here,
    including the use of ‘waste’ heat to raise the temp and reduce MC, in the
    following batch.
  6. By 18:00 the first gas burn had started and by 18:15 the 8 x 8mm holes in the
    base of the drum were all roaring
  7. This was about the 10th trial, and with each the seal on the drum
    lid has become less effective. This photo shows the burn of the escaping
    gases through these leaks. In a totally un-scientific guess I’d suggest
    that at least a litre of gas/second was burning happily through the gaps.
    None of this energy was in any way contributing to the char process. These
    waste gases burnt for 2 hours.

 

 

  1. With all the jets alight I then added bricks to the top of the drum, giving
    better insulation.

  1. By 19:00 the drum was glowing red hot when seen through the gaps in the top
    bricks, except for a small strip down the centre of the top. I dropped
    some glass from a broken bottle in a couple of the gaps, and within
    minutes the glass became malleable.
  2. Around 21:00 the gas burn started to slow down, and by 22:00 the last flame was
    gone.
  3. The front bricks were removed at dawn, and by midday the drum was cool enough
    to be opened without a risk of the char catching alight.

  1. The
    charring was complete, including the tyre rubber, the 2 phone books, and
    dense hardwood as large as 20cm/8” in diameter.
  2. Volume
    loss was in the region of 20% at a guess.

 

It is the energy output that continues to stun me. The
volume of gas that escaped through the poor lid seal was very substantial and
burnt for over 2 hours. In addition, the gas burning under the drum was
obviously far in excess of the volume required to maintain the char process,
just using the red heat of the drum as an indicator. And on top of that was the
vast heat energy given off to the atmosphere despite the attempts to provide
insulation.

 

I’ll continue making batches using this crude system
every weekend, but there’s not a lot more to prove and I now really need to
take the lessons learnt and build a decent drum and kiln. In particular the
effectiveness of the insulation will be a considerable determinant in the efficiency
of the process. I will aim for a castable refractory kiln in a similar shape to
the current brick one, with relatively narrow gaps between the drum and the
refractory except for the “firebox” underneath. It will have two hinged doors
at the front – the upper one allowing the drum to be slid out above the lower
firebox door. A similar upper door also for the rear, and this will also have
an adjustable vent to allow heat to escape rearwards. This would lead into a
second chamber where another drum loaded with wood is waiting its turn in the
queue, being pre-heated at the same time. When one drum has completed the char
process, it will be slid out to cool, the drum in the heat chamber at the rear
is slid in to take its place, the refractory is at high temp already, the gas
jets are lit, doors closed, the third drum is loaded and slid into the warming
chamber….

 

The drums to be fabricated from boiler plate, and
maybe with domed lids and toggle screws to clamp down. Then I need to work out
how to plug in a pipe or hose to vent off excess gas, plus a compressor and a
pressure vessel to store. And that pre-supposes a capacity to record
temperatures inside the drum so that this info can be fed to a controller that
will make decisions when and if to pipe off some gas for storage. Plus a
serious gas burner system under the drum, because I believe we can eliminate
the need for wood fuel and just use some of the stored excess gas. And then
some boiler tube at an upper level through which water can be piped and fed into
a large storage tank as a heat bank, and then into the house and/or a
greenhouse in winter through sub-floor piping, radiators, or a concrete storage
tank under the slab. I don’t have a house at the farm yet or even a greenhouse
much less an electricity supply but that just adds some more interesting
challenges. Its down to time and dollar availability.

 

In the meantime I’m continuing with the garden trials,
and certainly there is visible evidence of improved growth and vigour in the
plots which had the char added. The best is the one that also had some cocopeat
organic matter added, as well as some worm castings. Digging down a few inches
and grabbing a handful gives this sweet-smelling crumbly mix, laden with
organic matter and just seeming to be bursting with goodness. Hardly a
scientific analysis but I’ve been handling and smelling soil for a long time
and this lot is just about good enough to eat.

 

Max H

Syndicate content