Submitted by Erin Rasmussen on
Publication Type:Journal Article
Source:Waste Manag, Volume 28, Number 11, p.2320-8 (2008)
Keywords:Adsorption, Air Pollution/prevention & control, Carbon Dioxide/ isolation & purification, Carbon/analysis/ chemistry, Charcoal, Incineration/methods, Indicators and Reagents, Industry, Kinetics, Particle Size, Particulate Matter/analysis/ chemistry, Refuse Disposal/methods, Surface Properties
Fly ashes with high-unburned-carbon content, referred to as fly ash carbons, are an increasing problem for the utility industry, since they cannot be marketed as a cement extender and, therefore, have to be disposed. Previous work has explored the potential development of amine-enriched fly ash carbons for CO2 capture. However, their performance was lower than that of commercially available sorbents, probably because the samples investigated were not activated prior to impregnation and, therefore, had a very low surface area. Accordingly, the work described here focuses on the development of activated fly ash derived sorbents for CO2 capture. The samples were steam activated at 850 degrees C, resulting in a significant increase of the surface area (1075 m2/g). The activated samples were impregnated with different amine compounds, and the resultant samples were tested for CO2 capture at different temperatures. The CO2 adsorption of the parent and activated samples is typical of a physical adsorption process. The impregnation process results in a decrease of the surface areas, indicating a blocking of the porosity. The highest adsorption capacity at 30 and 70 degrees C for the amine impregnated activated carbons was probably due to a combination of physical adsorption inherent from the parent sample and chemical adsorption of the loaded amine groups. The CO2 adsorption capacities for the activated amine impregnated samples are higher than those previously published for fly ash carbons without activation (68.6 vs. 45 mg CO2/g sorbent).
Using Smart Source ParsingNov; Epub 2008 Feb 21
- Log in to post comments
- Google Scholar