Biochar News by Country

Australia

  • Magic biochar: recycles, fertilises and sequesters
    From the September 2006 edition of Agriculture Today.
    New South Wales Department of Primary Industries, Australia

    Thousands of years ago, Amazonian Indians burned their waste organic matter in low intensity fires covered with dirt and straw.

    The smouldering heat charred the organic matter, and the Indians added the charred material to their soils.

  • 'Managing the Carbon Cycle'
    KATANNING, Western Australia 21-22 March 2007
    www.amazingcarbon.com

    PROGRAM
    VENUE: Katanning New Lodge, 172 Clive St, Katanning

  • Manage carbon to sustain soil structure
    Jan Skjemstad, CSIRO LAND AND WATER AND CRC FOR GREENHOUSE ACCOUNTING in FARMING AHEAD No. 158 March 2005

    Soil organic carbon plays a critical role in the biological, chemical and physical health of a soil. But little is known about how crop management impacts on soil organic carbon levels and thus soil health. This article describes how a new approach to understanding this relationship could help farmers better manage soil organic carbon.

  • Bokashi Composting Australia
    Bokashi Composting Australia, NSW

    The Bokashi Bucket

    "The Bokashi Bucket is a practical and convenient alternative for transforming kitchen waste into a nutrient rich soil conditioner. This unique composting system uses the revolutionary EM (Effective Micro-Organism) Bokashi to create the ideal conditions for airtight (anaerobic) composting."

    How Bokashi Works
    Bokashi Workshops
    Products
    Order Form
    News
    Contact

    "Bokashi kitchen composting is easy and effective!
    As Seen on Better Homes & Gardens"

  • Crucible Carbon to Australian Task Group on Emissions Trading Issues
    Joe Herbertson, Les Strezov, Peter Burgess Crucible Carbon,Toront, NSW March 7, 2007

    7 March 2007

    Task Group on Emissions Trading Secretariat
    Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet

    Dear Secretariat,
    Mega Tonnage Carbon Capture & Sequestration by Chars in Soils and its place in the Design of Australia’s Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS)

  • Biochar.net organic charcoal agriculture
    Barry Batchelor, Australia May 2007

    This is a brand new website to showcase Organic Biochar development.

  • The Terra Preta Phenomenon
    Ray O’Grady and Rod Rush, DesertSmart Technologies, WA
    ‘Managing the Carbon Cycle’ Katanning Workshop 21-22 March 2007 www.amazingcarbon.com

    Abstract

  • Amazing Carbon: Managing the Carbon Cycle, Katanning, Western Australia (21-22 March 2007)
    Australian Soil Carbon Accreditation Scheme (ASCAS) www.amazingcarbon.com

    WORKSHOP PAPERS

    Ray O’Grady Importance of Soil Carbon

  • Australian developed technology wins United Nations World Environment Day Award – Press release
    BEST Energies, Australia, June 5, 2007
    Adriana DownieAdriana Downie
    BEST Energies wins top honour at the 2007 UN Association of Australia’s World Environment Day Awards for ‘Meeting the Greenhouse Challenge’.

  • Soils offer new hope as carbon sink
    NSW Department of Primary Industries: Science and Research, Australia, Wollongbar Agricultural Institute, 31 May 2007
    Steve KimberSteve Kimber

  • Presentations from the International Agrichar Initiative
    International Agrichar Initiative 2007 Conference, Terrigal, Australia, April 29 - May 2, 2007

    Monday, April 30, 2007: Conference Day 1

    8:00 am – 8:30 am: Henry Kendall Ballroom
    Welcome to Country, Welcome to Conference, Meeting Overview
    Stephen Joseph, BEST Energies, AUS
    Debbie Reed, International Agrichar Initiative, USA

  • Improving wheat production with deep banded Oil Mallee Charcoal in Western Australia (2.7 MB pdf)
    Paul Blackwell, Syd Shea, Paul Storer, Zakaria Solaiman, Mike Kerkmans, and Ian Stanley, IAI April 2007

    Deep Banded Mallee CharcoalDeep Banded Mallee Charcoal

  • Carbon Sequestration by Carbonization of Biomass and Forestation: Three Case Studies
    Makoto Ogawa,Yasuyuki Okimori, Fumio Takahashi, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Volume 11, Number 2, March 2006 , pp. 421-436(16)
    Publisher: Springer


    Abstract:
    We proposed the carbon sink project called “Carbon Sequestration by Forestation and Carbonization (CFC),” which involves biomass utilization and land conservation by incorporating the products of biomass carbonization into the agents for soil improvement, water purification, etc. Our purpose was to demonstrate the potential of the CFC scheme for carbon sequestration, particularly carbon storage in soil.


    Case studies were conducted in both developing and developed countries.


    1. In southern Sumatra, Indonesia, 88,369 Mg-C year−1 of wood residue from a plantation forest and excess bark from a pulp mill would be converted into 15,571 Mg-C year−1 of the net carbon sink by biochar for soil improvement. The fixed carbon recovery of the system is 21.0%.


    2. In a semiarid region in western Australia, the carbonization of wood residue was incorporated with multipurpose projects of a mallee eucalyptus plantation that involved the function of salinity prevention. During the project period of 35 years, the total carbon sink would reach 1,035,450 Mg-C with 14.0% by aboveground biomass, 33.1% by belowground biomass and 52.8% by biochar in soil.


    3. In southern Kyushu, Japan, the study was focused on the effective use of surplus heat from a garbage incinerator for carbonizing woody materials. Sawdust of 936.0 Mg-C year−1 would be converted into the net carbon sink of 298.5 Mg-C year−1 by carbonization, with the fixed carbon recovery of the system being 31.9%.


    Consequently, the CFC project could encourage the creation of a carbon sink in soil. However, we recognize that the quality standard of biochar, the stability of biochar in soil, and the methods for monitoring biochar utilization must be clarified before incorporating biochar carbon into the carbon credit system.


    Keywords: biochar; biomass utilization; carbonization; carbon sequestration; carbon sink


    Document Type: Research article
    DOI: 10.1007/s11027-005-9007-4
    Affiliations: Email: okimori_yasuyuki@kanso.co.jp

  • Improving water and soil resources for tree production - Vietnam
    NSW Department of Primary Industries, Australia

    Summary

    Water for irrigation is a scarce resource in topical dry seasons. Nutrient losses due to erosion and leaching are high in topical wet seasons. This project will evaluate practices within horticultural tree crops to increase the efficiency of use of scarce irrigation water and applied nutrients in subtropical NSW and Vietnam. The project will evaluate the potential to apply partial rootzone drying to cashew and macadamia nut crops. The effect of biochar on soil nutrient and water availability will be assessed.
    Project Objectives

    The objectives of this research project are to:

    1. Assess the potential sources, availability and costs of irrigation water in landscape units of cental coastal Vietnam.
    2. Identify current farmer practices and perceptions in relation to irrigation and nutrient management.
    3. Increase technical capacity of the Agricultural Science Institute for Southern Coastal Central Vietnam in water and soil science.
    4. Evaluate water and nutrient management strategies to improve productivity and profitability of tree crops, and resource use efficiency in central coastal Vietnam and northern coastal NSW.
    Partners

    Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR), Southern Cross University, Vietnamese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Ninh Thuan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development.
    Leader

    Peter Slavich
    Wollongbar

  • Climate Change, Carbon and Plants Briefings
    CRC for Greenhouse Acounting, Australia, 2006
    At the briefings, leading scientists presented the latest information on how climate change might affect plants and plant-based industry, and how we might adapt.
    Two briefings were held in 2006 - one in Melbourne on the 31st May and one in Sydney on the 13th June. In response to numerous requests from people unable to attend the briefings in person, the presentations were recorded and are now available online.
    'Questions' and 'Panel' sessions include audience questions and discussion between presenters and audience, expanding on the material provided in the presentations.
    Introduction
    Future climates and Australia's greenhouse profile - Dr Michael Robinson [EXE, 10.51MB]
    Questions and discussion [Melbourne] [MP3, 2.27MB]
    Stream 1 - Carbon in the Landscape
    Biomass carbon and Land Use Changes - Dr John Raison [EXE, 15.60MB]
    Questions - [Sydney] [MP3, 7.82MB] [Melbourne] [MP3, 10.44MB]
    Wood products as carbon stores; TimberCam - Mr Fabiano Ximenes [EXE, 10.94MB]
    Soil carbon and productivity - Mr Jan Skjemstad [View Online] [Download][EXE, 10.48MB]
    Questions [Melbourne] [MP3, 5.37MB]
    Panel - Dr Raison, Mr Fabiano Ximenes, Mr Jan Skjemstad [Sydney] [MP3, 18.46MB] [Melbourne] [MP3, 19.99MB]
    Stream 1 - Counting and Trading Carbon
    Increasing tree cover in grazing land - Dr Steven Bray [View Online] [Download] [EXE, 14.35MB]
    Questions [Sydney] [MP3, 3.70MB]
    Standards and Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) - Dr Beverley Henry [View Online] [Download] [EXE, 13.24MB]
    Questions [Sydney] [MP3, 1.82MB] [Melbourne] [MP3, 2.22MB]
    Stream 2 - Implications for Plants and Agriculture
    CO2 concentrations & the C cycle & Effects on plant growth - Dr John Evans and Professor Marilyn Ball [View Online ] [Download] [EXE, 19.81MB]
    Questions [Sydney] [MP3, 8.98MB] [Melbourne] [MP3, 3.74MB]
    How will climate change affect water availability - Dr Michael Roderick [View Online] [Download] [EXE, 14.50MB]
    Questions [Melbourne] [MP3, 4.60MB]
    The impacts of climate change on Australian viticulture - Ms Leanne Webb [View Online] [Download] [EXE, 12.19MB]
    Panel - Dr Evans, Prof. Ball, Dr Roderick, Ms Webb [Sydney] [MP3, 13.90MB] [Melbourne] [MP3, 18.12MB]
    Soil organic matter and productivity - Mr Jan Skjemstad [View Online] [Download][EXE, 10.20MB]
    Questions [Melbourne] [MP3, 6.08MB]
    Are there Win-Win Strategies for Minimising Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Agriculture? Agriculture calculators - Dr Richard Eckard, Mr Ian Galbally [EXE, 12.20MB]
    Panel - Mr Jan Skjemstad, Mr Ian Galbally, Dr Richard Eckard [Sydney] [MP3, 6.43MB] [Melbourne] [MP3, 8.19MB]
    Joint Session
    Carbon trading in Australia and internationally - Dr Annette Cowie and Dr Michael Robinson [View Online ] [Download] [EXE, 13.24MB]
    Questions [Melbourne] [MP3, 16.89MB]
    Carbon accounting tools - Mr John Carter [EXE, 6.40MB]
    Carbon accounting tools - Dr Matthew Searson [EXE, 8.55MB]
    Panel - Dr Annette Cowie, Dr Michael Robinson, Dr Matthew Searson, Mr John Carter [Sydney] [MP3, 12.37MB] [Melbourne] [MP3, 13.96MB]

  • Agronomic values of greenwaste biochar as a soil amendment
    K. Y. Chan, L. Van Zwieten, I. Meszaros, A. Downie,and S. Joseph
    Australian Journal of Soil Research 45(8) 629–634, December 2007

    Abstract

    A pot trial was carried out to investigate the effect of biochar produced from greenwaste by pyrolysis on the yield of radish (Raphanus sativus var. Long Scarlet) and the soil quality of an Alfisol. Three rates of biochar (10, 50 and 100 t/ha) with and without additional nitrogen application (100 kg N/ha) were investigated. The soil used in the pot trial was a hardsetting Alfisol (Chromosol) (0–0.1 m) with a long history of cropping. In the absence of N fertiliser, application of biochar to the soil did not increase radish yield even at the highest rate of 100 t/ha. However, a significant biochar × nitrogen fertiliser interaction was observed, in that higher yield increases were observed with increasing rates of biochar application in the presence of N fertiliser, highlighting the role of biochar in improving N fertiliser use efficiency of the plant. For example, additional increase in DM of radish in the presence of N fertiliser varied from 95% in the nil biochar control to 266% in the 100 t/ha biochar-amended soils. A slight but significant reduction in dry matter production of radish was observed when biochar was applied at 10 t/ha but the cause is unclear and requires further investigation.

    Significant changes in soil quality including increases in pH, organic carbon, and exchangeable cations as well as reduction in tensile strength were observed at higher rates of biochar application (>50 t/ha). Particularly interesting are the improvements in soil physical properties of this hardsetting soil in terms of reduction in tensile strength and increases in field capacity.

    Keywords: charcoal, char, agrichar, soil strength, soil carbon sequestration, hardsetting soil, slow pyrolysis.
    Australian Journal of Soil Research 45(8) 629–634
    Submitted: 27 July 2007 Accepted: 2 November 2007 Published: 7 December 2007
    Full text DOI: 10.1071/SR07109

    See also:Assessing agronomic values of chars to an Australian hardsetting soil presentation to the International Agrichar Initiative conference, Australia, 2007.

  • Restoring soil carbon can reverse global warming
    Erich J. Knight, February 21, 2008

    Here is a strait forward conversion of the impact of building soil organic material (SOM) on ppm of GHGs using just marginal land.

    http://news.mongabay.com/2008/0221-soil_carbon_lovell_interview.html

    Tony Lovell of Soil Carbon P/L in Australia estimates that by actively supporting regrowth of vegetation in damaged ecosystems, billions of tons of carbon dioxide can be sequestered from the atmosphere.

    "Determining how much carbon dioxide (CO2) can physically be consumed from the atmosphere?

    As the planet has 7.8 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide in circulation for each 1 ppm of atmospheric CO2, and there are 5 billion hectares of inappropriately managed or unmanaged, desertifying savannahs on the Earth (which on empirical evidence we contend to be the case), the question that should sensibly be asked is: How much carbon dioxide would be absorbed if policies were put in place (in Australia and elsewhere) that caused the focus of on-ground management to be deliberately directed towards the widespread consumption of cyclical GHGs within the currently under-utilised savannah lands?

    Consumption of CO2 per hectare
    • One hectare is 10,000 sq. metres. If a hectare of soil 33.5 cm deep, with a bulk density of 1.4 tonnes per cubic metre is considered, there is a soil mass per hectare of about 4,700 tonnes.
    • If appropriate management practices were adopted and these practices achieved and sustained a 1% increase in soil organic matter (SOM)6, then 47 tonnes of SOM per hectare will be added to organic matter stocks held below the soil surface
    • This 47 tonnes of SOM will contain approximately 27 tonnes of Soil Carbon (ie 47 tonnes at 58% Carbon) per hectare
    • In the absence of other inputs this Carbon may only be derived from the atmosphere via the natural function known as the photo-synthetic process. To place approximately 27 tonnes of Soil Carbon per hectare into the soil, approximately 100 tonnes of carbon dioxide must be consumed out of the atmosphere by photosynthesis
    • A 1% change in soil organic matter across 5 billion hectares will sequester 500 billion tonnes of physical CO2
    Converting global Soil Carbon capacity to ppm of atmospheric GHGs
    1. Every 1% increase in retained SOM within the topmost 33.5 cm of the soil must capture and hold approximately 100 tonnes per hectare of atmospheric carbon dioxide (the variability in the equation being due only to the soil bulk density). We submit that under determined, appropriate management, that this is readily achievable within a very few years
    2. For each 1% increase in SOM achieved on the 5 billion hectares there will be removed 64 ppm of carbon dioxide from atmospheric circulation (500,000,000,000 tonnes CO2 / 7,800,000,000 tonnes per ppm = 64 ppm).
    3. Soil Organic Matter is the plant material released into the soil during the natural phases of plant growth. It includes root material sloughed off below the soil surface and plant litter carried into the soil by microbes, insects and rainfall
    4. Soil Carbon is the elemental carbon contained within Soil Organic Matter (SOM).
    5. One tonne of CO2 contains 12/44 units of carbon (ie 0.27 tonnes of carbon per tonne of CO2.). Therefore 27 tonnes of carbon sequesters 27/0.27 = 100 tonnes CO2 (rounded). NB Carbon atomic weight 12, oxygen atomic weight 16 ie CO2 = 12+(16+16) = 44
    The global opportunity and numbers

    It appears that the pre-industrial level of atmospheric carbon dioxide was 280ppm, and that globally we are now at 455ppm, and heading towards 550ppm. To get from 550ppm back to 280ppm, 270ppm must be removed. Globally, a 4.2% increase in SOM would potentially reverse the expected situation. In any case, any form of determined management will substantially reduce the now crippling legacy loadings in the atmosphere.

    Erich J. Knight
    1047 Dave Berry Rd.
    McGaheysville, VA. 22840
    540-289-9750
    shengar@aol.com

  • Improving wheat production with deep banded Oil Mallee Charcoal in Western Australia
    Paul Blackwell1, Syd Shea2, Paul Storer3, Zakaria Solaiman4, Mike Kerkmans5, and Ian Stanley6
    Agchar Initiative Conference Terrigal New South Wales. April 29 - May 2, 2007

    SUMMARY
    • There can be benefits to wheat income from deep banded oil mallee charcoal in the low rainfall areas of WA; the trials on acid sandy clay loam and acid sand in 2005 showed up to $96/ha additional gross income at wheat prices of $150/ha; especially when applied with mineral fertilisers and inoculated soil microbes. Much of the yield improvement can be explained by better grain survival, associated with reduced drought stress.

    • There were encouraging effects of charcoal on arbuscular mycorrhiza (AM) colonisation. Banded oil mallee charcoal improved AM colonisation of wheat roots by 3 fold, when used with mineral fertilisers and AM is inoculated with the seed in the acid sandy clay loam with a low population of indigenous AM. Early phosphorus uptake was not improved by AM colonisation; P supply from the soil and applied fertiliser was already adequate.

    • AM colonisation in spring was related to effects of charcoal application on grain survival in inoculated mineral fertiliser treatments. This infers AM hyphae may have improved water supply to reduce drought stress and loss of grains in these treatments.

    • The true economic value of oil mallee charcoal will be clearer when the cost of charcoal production and application is better known and long term effects of charcoal, especially with inoculated AMs and mineral fertilisers is better understood. The potential to achieve a commercial return from the sequestration of charcoal as an offset for carbon
    dioxide emissions in broadscale agriculture will also help calculate true economic value.

    • More research is worthwhile on the long term effects of incorporated charcoal in a range of soil conditions and seasons, from various sources and how low the banded charcoal rate needs to be to encourage better yields from mineral fertiliser with inoculated AM.

    INTRODUCTION
    Oil Mallees are the first native woody perennial species to be promoted as a commercial crop in the lower rainfall areas of the southwest land division of Western Australia, primarily stimulated by the need to ameliorate salinity caused by the clearing of native vegetation for agriculture (Bartle and Shea, 2002). Mallees are hardy plants that are well suited as a perennial crop through their ability to re-sprout from the large lignotuber after the above
    ground mass has been lost through fire or harvesting. In 2000 a group of Oil Mallee growers from Kalannie (300 km NE of Perth, Western Australia) began producing eucalyptus oil for the Australian market (see the Oil Mallee Association www.oilmallee.com.au ). Integrated processing of mallee biomass to produce electricity, activated carbon and eucalyptus oil in a central processing facility has been the main emphasis of industry development since the late 1990’s. Western Power, Enecon and the Oil Mallee Company have successfully developed a ‘test of concept’ Integrated Wood Processing (IWP) plant at Narrogin. Bell and Bennett (2002) estimated that the NPV of the net benefit to landowners of planting mallees in a local catchment area to supply a 5MW IWP would be about $6.2 million over 20 years. Charcoal is a valuable by-product of such IWPs and a possible by-product of farm based distillation of eucalyptus oil.

    It has become well recognised in Japan and some other parts of Asia that charcoal from forestry products and rice hull can stimulate indigenous soil microbial activity (Ogawa, 1994; Nishio, 1996). Charcoal has especially encouraged arbuscular mycorrhiza (AM) which can help supply phosphorus symbiotically to many agricultural crops (Ogawa et al., 1983) and rhizobia, which can fix nitrogen from the atmosphere to supply leguminous plants (Nishio and Okano, 1991). Field experiments in Indonesia (Yamato et al. 2006) showed charcoal made from tree bark applied at 10 L/ha could increase the yield of maize by about 50%, to 15 t/ha, when added to 500 kg/ha of NPK (15:15:15) fertiliser on an acid highly weathered infertile tropical soil; associated with increased AM fungal colonisation. Lehmann and Rondon (2006)
    also identify numerous benefits of bio char to plant nutrition and microbial activity in the humid tropics. Benefits of charcoal to soil microbial activity have also been recognised in temperate forest environments (Zakrisson et al. 1996; Pietikainen et al. 2000).

    Charcoal seems to assist microbial activity by having a porosity that provides a favourable microhabitat, weak alkalinity and by being a substrate unfavourable for saprophytes (Saito and Marumoto, 2002). AM fungi easily extend their extraradical hyphae into charcoal buried in the soil and sporulate in the particles (Ogawa, 1987). Postma et al. (1990) show evidence that rhizobia in pores <50 _m are protected from predation by protozoan predators; this
    could be an important microhabitat property provided by charcoal in soils with low clay content.

    Encouragement and establishment of AM fungi in Western Australian soils has encountered many challenges. “The objective of identifying procedure for managing mycorrhizal fungi is more appropriately restated as managing conditions to suit the growth and activity of beneficial populations of mycorrhizal fungi” (Abbot and Gazey, 1994). Introduced AM fungi can suffer competition with indigenous AM fungi and be ineffective for crop phosphorus supply due to high levels of background soluble P (Gazey et al. 2004). Australian native grass species can also be much more efficient at accessing insoluble forms of phosphate than introduced wheat varieties; whose rhizosphere colonies can be very different (Marschner et al. 2006). This may be an adaptation to the low clay content environment of many Australian topsoils; low clay content reduces the amount of small pore space to help some microorganisms prosper. Charcoal in suitable amount and form may provide the missing microhabitat in WA topsoils to help introduced AM fungi and other microbes survive and colonise introduced agricultural crops.

    One commercial fertiliser company (Western Mineral Fertilisers; Tenterden WA) has developed products which minimise the abundance of readily soluble phosphorus to encourage symbiotic and other processes of inoculated soil microbes. Zeolite was initially included and intended to provide enhanced ion exchange capacity, and also a micro habitat
    within the zeolite pores; however the pore volume may not be sufficient. It was a reasonable hypothesis that charcoal addition may improve the microhabitat further than the use of zeolite.

    The opportunity to test hypotheses about charcoal effects on soil and use of soil microbes to improve crop nutrient supply came about in 2005. There was an intensive research effort to examine the efficacy of very wide rows of wheat on shallow soils in the low rainfall areas east of Geraldton (Blackwell et al. 2006; Blackwell 2007). With some support and encouragement from the Oil Mallee Company and Western Mineral fertilisers we developed the following experiments using no-till methods for crop establishment and very wide rows to minimise drought stress. Attempts to follow the long-term effects at Pindar failed due to a very dry winter season in 2006.

    See complete paper attached and at:http://www.oilmallee.com.au/pdf/Improving_wheat_prod.pdf
    See oral presentation at:
    http://www.iaiconference.org/images/Blackwell_-_Improving_Wheat_Production_with_Mallee_Charcoal.pdf

    1Department of Agriculture and Food, Geraldton WA, 2 Oil Mallee Company of Australia, 3Western Mineral
    Fertilisers, 4University of Western Australia, School of Earth and Geographical Sciences, 5Oil Mallee
    Association of WA, 6 "Bungadale", Kalannie , WA

  • On the Practical Side
    Max Henderson, SE Queensland, Australia, April 19, 2008
    Cooran char bed finished 031608
    (Select photo to enlarge)

    Dear All,

    For those on the list who haven’t had the opportunity to experiment, here are some photos of my first trials. Apologies to those who are well ahead of this stage.

    Photo 1 shows the very basic kiln, constructed of un-bonded second-hand bricks and sized to take a 200 litre drum (55 gallon in he US). This particular drum has a removable lid held in place with an over-centre clamp.
    Char kiln01
    Photo 2 shows the drum in place and loaded with seasoned offcuts of local hardwoods such as Ironbark (Euc piniculata), which is hard and dense. The drum is raised off the brick floor the height of 2 bricks to allow firewood to be placed under. The base of the drum (on its side) is drilled with 8 x 8mm holes in a line evenly spaced. These permit the generated gases to exit and burn.
    Char kiln02
    3 shows the flames after the load has started to gassify. Depending in the intensity of the external fire and the sizes, moisture content and density of the timber load, the beginning of the gasification phase can take from 30 minutes upwards.
    Char kiln03
    4 and 5 show the char output.
    Char kiln04
    Char kiln05
    Photo 6 gives an idea of the vast amount of energy released. At this trial the front of the kiln was also bricked up once the fire had started, to further concentrate the heat. For pure spectacle this is best done at night, preferably lubricated with copious cold beers. This is indeed hot and thirsty work. What you can’t hear is the whistling of the gas as it exits the holes in the drum, and the roar of the fire. Obviously there is huge opportunity to capture surplus gas and compress to store.
    Char kiln06
    7 shows the first experimental vegetable bed prior to planting, approx 4m x 1.2m. The char was broken up before adding but this could have been done much better. Around 10cm thickness was added to the bed. Also added was 5 cm of compost and 1 kg of NPK fertiliser (13:13:15 + 2Mg). The bed was then forked a number of times to a 20cm depth. For comparison purposes an adjacent bed was prepared in the same manner including the compost and the NPK, but no added char.
    Cooran char bed finished 031608
    Corn, broad beans and basil were planted in both. Definitely germination was better in the char bed and definitely initial growth was also more vigorous. Unfortunately the wallabies broke the fence ending that trial, but the fence has been reinforced and the beds planted again. This time I’ve added a third bed the same as the first with the char, compost and NPK, but added 5 cm of worm castings from my composting worm experimental pile. (I believe composting worms have equivalent miracle capacity as does char).

    The test site is just above the creek flats on land that was a dairy farm for maybe 100 years before being abandoned some 20 years ago and allowed to return to natural forest, mainly eucalypts. Around 5 acres have been cleared. Soil texture is loamy, with recent tests indicating deficiencies across the full range of nutrients. Annual rainfall is in the 1500mm range. Being a fairly civilised part of the world we don’t have any of that snow stuff but winter daytime temps can plunge horrifically to 10 deg C (50F), with occasional night time frosts. Terrifying. Right now we’re at the beginning of Autumn.

    I’ll update in a couple of weeks.

    Max H
    mfh01@bigpond.net.au

  • Agrichar Video
    Australian Broadcasting Corporation, 2007

    Video on Agrichar, International Agrichar Initiative conference (April 2007), BEST Technologies, and use of agrichar in Australia.

    http://www.abc.net.au/science/broadband/catalyst/asx/Agrichar_hi.asx